Lymphadenopathy is defined as one or more enlarged lymph nodes ≥1cm diameter. Although size alone does not determine the cause, risk of malignancy is less likely if lymph nodes are smaller than 2cm diameter and/or progressive enlargement has not been documented. There is a correlation with increasing size of lymphadenopathy with risk of malignancy/pathology. See sections below for details and referral guidelines.
Localised lymphadenopathy refers to only one region effected. Generalised lymphadenopathy is when more than one region effected.
Regions include neck, axillae, groins, mediastinal and abdominal.
Lymphadenopathy is most commonly due to infection, but can be due to inflammation (e.g. sarcoidosis), autoimmune disorders or malignancy including lymphoproliferative diseases (lymphoma).
Malignancies are identified in 14% of people presenting with lymphadenopathy which increases to 28% if patients are >65 years. A core or excision biopsy of a lymph node will be required to make a diagnosis.
Please also see the following pages:
Assessment in Primary care
Investigations in primary care
If clinical assessment is that nodes are benign and if patient is well with unexplained small volume lymphadenopathy and above tests are normal, then imaging is not required -this approach is supported by NG12 (4) and local Ultrasound guidance.
BMJ Best Practice
The following has a guide to assessment and differential diagnosis of lymphadenopathy but does require a subscription to access:
Red flags for Haematological Malignancy
Consider other malignancies depending on sight of lymphadenopathy
Consider Sarcoma
Features which may suggest a sarcoma rather than lymphadenopathy:
See Bone & Soft Tissue - USC (2WW) for advice on appropriate investigation and management.
If patient does not meet any of above criteria for USC/2WW referral and if still in any doubt over whether to refer urgently or observe in patients with otherwise unexplained lymphadenopathy then please consider:
Referral
Refer via appropriate USC/2WW pathways as indicated in Red Flag section above.
If malignancy is not suspected and referral is still considered necessary, then please use the appropriate routine referral route via eRS according to suspected cause. There are a range of causes that will not be appropriate for assessment in a haematology clinic.
Minimal information: the referral letter should include abnormal clinical findings (location, size, any associated features) and any abnormal full blood count results or other relevant test results, particularly if these investigations were not done in laboratories of the hospital to which the referral is made.
Advice
If unexplained lymphadenopathy but not meeting criteria for USC/2WW referral then consider Haematology advice and guidance service via eRS. Queries will be responded by a consultant haematologist within 3 working days.
Minimal information should be included as above.
Acutely Unwell Patients
Consider medical admission if acutely unwell - Medical Assessment/Admission and Weekday IUC Professional Line.
(On call haematology SpR can be contacted 9am to 5pm via hospital switchboard. ONLY for emergency advice. Out of hours and weekends – emergency advice may be obtained from the on-call haematology clinician via hospital switchboard. SpR may not always be able to respond so advice is to consider admission or use advice and guidance in preference).
SWAG guideline Lymphadenopathy (swagcanceralliance.nhs.uk)
BMJ best practice guideline: Assessment of lymphadenopathy.pdf (bmj.com)
NICE guidelines: Scenario: Lymphadenopathy | Management | Neck lump | CKS | NICE
References
(1) Unexplained Lymphadenopathy: Evaluation and Differential Diagnosis | AAFP
(2) Assessment of lymphadenopathy - Differential diagnosis of symptoms | BMJ Best Practice
Efforts are made to ensure the accuracy and agreement of these guidelines, including any content uploaded, referred to or linked to from the system. However, BNSSG ICB cannot guarantee this. This guidance does not override the individual responsibility of healthcare professionals to make decisions appropriate to the circumstances of the individual patient, in consultation with the patient and/or guardian or carer, in accordance with the mental capacity act, and informed by the summary of product characteristics of any drugs they are considering. Practitioners are required to perform their duties in accordance with the law and their regulators and nothing in this guidance should be interpreted in a way that would be inconsistent with compliance with those duties.
Information provided through Remedy is continually updated so please be aware any printed copies may quickly become out of date.